Reporting an vulnerability
I have a suggestion for you:
When reporting a vulnerability, the HTTP method is missing in the
HTTP request.
What i see is
CONNECT example.com:443 HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com:443
What i'd like to see is
CONNECT example.com:443 HTTP/1.1
GET /index/start?id=1234&origin=abcd
Host: example.com:443
That would make manual verifying and repeating the attack very simpler.
Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.
Keyboard shortcuts
Generic
| ? | Show this help |
|---|---|
| ESC | Blurs the current field |
Comment Form
| r | Focus the comment reply box |
|---|---|
| ^ + ↩ | Submit the comment |
You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac
Support Staff 1 Posted by Tasos Laskos on 08 May, 2015 01:39 PM
That's the way it usually works, in you're case you're performing a scan on an HTTPS website via a proxy right?
2 Posted by Marco Eberl on 08 May, 2015 01:40 PM
Yes, you're right
Support Staff 3 Posted by Tasos Laskos on 08 May, 2015 01:43 PM
That's interesting, I'm pulling debugging info from
libcurlfor the raw HTTP traffic.I'll look into this, see if I can pull the actual request instead of the
CONNECTone under those circumstances.Thanks for the feedback man, I'll keep you posted.
Support Staff 4 Posted by Tasos Laskos on 08 May, 2015 04:30 PM
Looks like it's possible to extract the right data and loads more -- there could be a cool plugin somewhere in there.
Anyways, I thought it best to ignore the proxy related stuff so the
CONNECTcalls won't be included.https://github.com/Arachni/arachni/commit/860515cec2ec7e1740e1038d6...
Thanks for the feedback.
Tasos Laskos closed this discussion on 08 May, 2015 04:30 PM.