Choose of xmlrpc
Maybe it's a stupid question, but what as motived your choice for xmlrpc for the grid instead of a modern queuing solution like resque or sidekiq ?
Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.
Keyboard shortcuts
Generic
| ? | Show this help |
|---|---|
| ESC | Blurs the current field |
Comment Form
| r | Focus the comment reply box |
|---|---|
| ^ + ↩ | Submit the comment |
You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac
Support Staff 1 Posted by Tasos Laskos on 05 Oct, 2012 01:47 PM
Erm, I don't use XMLRPC and there's no queuing.
I'd like to give you a more detailed answer but I'm not sure which parts interest you so if you'd like to ask about how a specific piece of Arachni is designed I'd be glad to give you an overview.
2 Posted by Beunwa on 05 Oct, 2012 01:50 PM
Argh sorry for my mistake, I wrote without double check my thought.
I meant why did you choose distributed components with RPC instead of a queing system ?
Support Staff 3 Posted by Tasos Laskos on 05 Oct, 2012 01:56 PM
Ah cool, this should answer your question: http://support.arachni-scanner.com/kb/deployment-options/software-a...
Short answer, you can go from on-demand to any other (more complex/intricate) model, but it'd be harder to go from a complex model to on-demand.
Plus, the ability to control scanner instances over RPC allows for the development of any sort of user interface and integration with 3rd party systems (and allows for cool stuff like this).
If you've got more questions feel free to re-open. :)
Tasos Laskos closed this discussion on 05 Oct, 2012 01:56 PM.